The Bombay High Court will hear actor Imran Khan’s petition difficult a directive issued by the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) asking him to depart India on October 26. The actor has challenged the October 14 be aware, arguing that it became issued with out giving him a prior listening to and violated his rights as an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) cardholder.The remember changed into referred to earlier than a division bench comprising Chief Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna on Monday. Senior endorse Venkatesh Dhond, acting for Khan, informed the court docket that the actor had received the notice after trying to attend a protest, wherein he turned into stopped midway and needed to return.

Dhond informed the bench that the Central government had been served a copy of the petition and asked an early listening to on October 21. However, the courtroom scheduled the problem for October 26 to permit the FRRO time to achieve instructions at the petition.

During the hearing, the bench also requested Khan’s attorneys to implead the Maharashtra authorities as a party to the case so that the courtroom may want to confirm whether or not the actor had any crook antecedents.

“Are there any criminal antecedents? Join State as celebration, so that during case. This is a neighborhood matter. So make State of Maharashtra a party,” the court docket said.
Why Imran Khan challenged the FRRO note
In his petition, Khan has questioned the circumstances and manner in which the October 14 directive changed into issued. He has alleged that the authorities acted in haste with out giving him an opportunity to provide his case and bypassed the statutory protections to be had to him as an OCI cardholder. The actor has also claimed that the movement observed social media campaigns concentrated on him through political figures.

According to the petition, the authorities issued the directive under public pressure in preference to through an independent evaluation of the situations. Khan has sought the quashing of the October 14 notice and an period in-between stay on its operation. He has additionally asked the courtroom to restrain authorities from taking coercive steps, which include deportation, issuing lookout notices, blacklisting him or interfering together with his OCI repute.

Additionally, the actor has sought the manufacturing of internal records referring to the choice to direct him to depart India.
What caused the ‘Leave India’ be aware?
The directive was issued after Khan was in short detained via the police following his participation in demonstrations in opposition to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

The notice got here shortly after Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) chief Kirit Somaiya filed a primary data document (FIR) at Mumbai’s Gamdevi police station, alleging public-order violations beneath the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Khan’s petition, filed on October 17, questions the velocity with which the FRRO issued the directive following those developments. He has argued that the authorities didn't observe the system required earlier than taking movement that would have an effect on his potential to stay in India.
Imran Khan demanding situations word, not OCI cancellation proceedings
The actor’s petition additionally increases questions on the felony safeguards to be had to OCI cardholders. It argues that the FRRO bypassed Section 7D of the Citizenship Act, which presents for the cancellation of OCI registration on distinctive grounds and calls for the prescribed method to be accompanied.

On October 17, the FRRO one after the other issued a show-motive notice asking Khan why his OCI registration should no longer be cancelled under Section 7D of the Citizenship Act. However, the actor has now not challenged that word inside the gift petition.

The difference is considerable because the October 14 directive asking him to go away India and the subsequent display-cause note regarding his OCI registration are separate movements.